|
<<back
to news
Reservist families
face healthcare jam
-
- - - - - - - - - - -
By
Janelle Carter
March
25, 2003 | WASHINGTON
(AP) -- Families of reservists called up for the war could be in a health
care jam. After 30 days of active duty, insurance coverage by the reservists'
regular employers switches to a military plan, and that can mean having
to switch doctors.
Lawmakers want
to let them keep their private coverage, with the government picking up
the premiums.
In the past
week, the Bush administration has begun urging government agencies to
continue paying the premiums for federal employees called to active duty
so that they can keep their employer-based insurance with no penalty.
And in Congress,
Sen. Edward Kennedy and Rep. Mike Capuano, both Massachusetts Democrats,
have offered legislation that would amend health laws to allow activated
reservists to keep their employer-based coverage. The federal government
would pay their premiums.
"The object
here is to provide more seamless coverage for dependents and reservists
so they don't have to drop out of their civilian program, . . . and then
somewhere down the line, go about re-establishing their insurance," said
Steve Anderson, legislative counsel for the Reserve Officers Association.
With the efforts
under way, "They can continue with the doctors they know," Anderson said.
"It will be more seamless."
Kennedy said
"the least we can do for these brave men and women is to help their families
at home by assuring they receive quality health care without interruption
during their absence."
So far, close
to 213,000 reservists have been mobilized.
Supporters said
the changes essentially would help family members of reservists. Those
mobilized for more than 30 days of duty, and their family members, are
covered under the military health insurance program known as TRICARE.
While the reservist
has easy access to care while in service, family members often must scramble
to find new doctors to accommodate their new health plan. The sudden change
can be even more traumatic if a member of the family is undergoing a specific
treatment regimen, supporters of the bill said.
The idea of
helping ease health care problems of activated reservists' families already
has found some Republican support.
"It's something
I think is worth pursuing, and in fact we are," said Rep. John McHugh,
R-N.Y., chairman of the House Armed Forces subcommittee that deals with
reservist issues. "It is an issue for many of these individuals, and we
certainly feel an obligation to do whatever is appropriate and achievable
to smooth that out."
The proposed
congressional legislation amends health rules known as COBRA, or the Consolidated
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986. COBRA allows workers to continue
receiving health insurance for up to 18 months after becoming unemployed,
but the employee must pay the full premium. The bill allows reservists
to use the COBRA mechanism to keep their employer-based coverage when
called to active duty, with the federal government paying full premiums.
The concept
isn't entirely new. Two years ago, the Defense Department began paying
premiums for its civilian employees called to active duty in the Reserves
or National Guard.
Last week, Kay
Coles James, head of the Bush administration's Office of Personnel Management,
sent a memo to federal agency heads urging them to do likewise. Currently,
when a reservist who is a federal employee is called to duty, the government
pays the full premium, but the employee accrues a debt for their portion
that must be repaid.
James has told
agencies that they have the authority to pay the full premium for 12-18
months without requiring the employee to pay the money back. Each agency
would be responsible for drafting its own rules and guidelines.
James' action
was precipitated by the number of reservists called to active duty in
recent months, said Abby Block, OPM's senior policy adviser for employee
and family policy. According to the agency, there are 54,427 reservists
within the federal government; 11,254 of those have been activated.
"Many, many
of these folks have family at home," Block said. "They wanted to be sure,
and we wanted to be sure, they could continue their health care coverage
without being concerned about facing a substantial debt when they come
back."
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
|